 |
Dig
deeper into the discussion (or go back) |
 |
|
|
Forward this post to a friend!
|
|
|
Argument against the Existence of a Perfect Creator
|
If a perfect creator exists, then creation must be imperfect or it would be identical to its creator and there is no distinction in perfection. However, if creation is imperfect, then its creator cannot be perfect, because perfection cannot create imperfection. Therefore, a perfect creator cannot exist.
Logical refutation?
Felix
|
Verdict:
7.33.
felixwinslow (7.33)
|
USA
|
6/4/2003 4:34:18 PM
|
|
|
Argument against the Existence of a Perfect Creator
|
Perfection, being a subjective term, allows for many annomalies.
To run with this on a Christian slant, god "created" mankind in god's own image and then instilled free will into them. God, who has a concept of the difficulty of the bipolar craziness of the idea that something can be good or evil told a & e not to eat the fruit of knowledge (the acceptence of the dichotomy of good and Evil), which of course we all know they did. In this sense, god is perfect as god understands that there is no good or evil only action and non-action, and humaity is imperfect because it is totally and completely hung up on it this whole "good vs evil" thing. I believe that this story represents humans growing into sentience, evolving away from the "if i can't eat it, i'll fuck it" animal mentallity that amazingly enough some folks still seem to have a supscription to.
To put it anotherway, I can bowl a perfect game, 12 strikes in a row. This does not make me perfect. If a perfect creation can come from an imperfect being why can not a perfect creation from a perfect being, if left to its own devices, become imperfect?
|
Verdict:
6.67.
Log in to rate
torinaga (7.71)
|
Tacoma, WA
|
6/4/2003 5:47:17 PM
|
|
|
|
Argument against the Existence of a Perfect Creator
|
Interesting.
You have added nothing to the definition of perfection to define it as subjective. Perfection, to be anything, must concurrently be objective because, like subjectivity, it refers to a state of being and, whether potential, actual or otherwise imaginative, being (a la Heidegger's "das sein") is a property of existence.
Additionally, you state that perfection is "a subjective term, [that] allows for many annomalies." An anomaly is something that deviates from normalcy. What is perfection in its "normal" state? What are abnormal states of perfection? If perfection is abnormal, then it is not perfect.
In reference to your Christian argument supporting free will with God's inculpability, I hope you realize that a creator is not considered perfect because he understands that perfection does not exist. You are effectively stating this by declaring that "god understands that there is no good or evil only action and non-action, and humaity is imperfect because it is totally and completely hung up on it this whole 'good vs evil' thing." Humanity cannot be imperfect if good and evil do not exist. To what would you contrast perfection? Is imperfection not tied to evil in at least one instance? More importantly, I hope you did not intend to imply that humans would be perfect if not for being "hung up" on issues of importance. In implying this, you also realize that you have implied that evil is an unimportant concept. Tell this to the parent or child of a murder victim. Tell this to the murderer.
I cannot address your bowling analogy as I cannot see what it adds or how it can be construed as a simplified explanation of God's inculpability.
Felix
|
Verdict:
still out.
Log in to rate
felixwinslow (7.33)
|
USA
|
6/4/2003 7:18:28 PM
|
|
|
|
Argument against the Existence of a Perfect Creator
|
Perfection is a card held by an observer. When the observer observes something that it can find no fault with, it applies this card or signifier to that something, be it a being or a system or an action. Like anything spoken ot thought by a human this notion of perfection is fleeting and tied invariably to the existence of that person or that person's virial idea structure.
This is why it is anamolous. I could look at a an install of Linux, and note that it is a perfect install for a specific application. Someone who is more intellegent or knowledgable on the subject can look at it and find flaws. If never we two should meet and discuss said install that notion of perfect will still live in my mind, where all the signifiers I can relate with live.
Now I realize that some may draw a line between a subjective and objective perfection, but I will argue that since objectivity is uncomprehendable by the human mind, it is in the realm of faery dust and dragons. "Humanity cannot be imperfect if good and evil do not exist."
This is true, Good and Evil are value judgements placed on objects. If no judgement is made on an object it is perfect as it is without flaw.
"To what would you contrast perfection? Is imperfection not tied to evil in at least one instance?"
Good and Evil are entirely tied into notion of perfection, but only in a subjective manner. If we wish to attemp to speak objectively (which we cannot due infallably because we are not omnicent) we have to eliminate the notion of good and bad as it is a construct of our ego, society and intellect. The only some what objective definition of perfect is "Lacking nothing essential to the whole; complete of its nature or kind. " (www.dictionary.com). Thus perfection is "utlimate reality", things as they really happen on the level below observation and reflection. Objective Perfection requires seeing the whole, in essence knowing everything.
"More importantly, I hope you did not intend to imply that humans would be perfect if not for being "hung up" on issues of importance. In implying this, you also realize that you have implied that evil is an unimportant concept. Tell this to the parent or child of a murder victim. Tell this to the murderer."
While that is exactly implying towards this arguement, I do not believe that evil is an unimportant concept. I think that socially it is a very important concept in the "post apple" world. Unfortunatly it is easily loaded and often used to as a herding technique (the manipulation of crowds).
On the other hand if we had no concept of good and evil, there would be no real desire, which I believe is the driving force behind most of our actions, good or evil.
I apologize for the bowling anaolgy, I typed it, took it out and then put it back in. It only scarely make sense to me.
Thanks for conversating this place has been dead for too long, t
|
Verdict:
7.00.
Log in to rate
torinaga (7.71)
|
Tacoma, WA
|
6/5/2003 11:37:09 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Argument against the Existence of a Perfect Creator
|
Hello -
You provide the 'perfect' refutation to your final statement - "...Therefore, a perfect creator cannot exist." - in your own opening line, which states in part: "...and there is no distinction in perfection." There IS no distinction {i.e. separateness} period. ALL IS ONE! It is a HOLOGRAPHIC UNIVERSE {EXISTENCE} with NONSEPARATENESS as a basic condition. The world in a grain of sand. Therefore - Creation and its' Creator ARE identical! Everything IS Perfect - just as it is! How could it be any other way? Words and Concepts {like Perfection} are synergistic by-products of a "SELF-LIMITED AWARENESS" and a MATERIALISTIC LANGUAGE. Lao Tzu wrote: {my paraphrase}
...the word is not the thing.
The idea or thought of "Perfection" as well as "Perfect Creator" are merely fingers pointing at reflections of the moon. Don't confuse the pointing-finger with the infinite reflections...
This is my first entry at gazm.org. I am an AKMA according to the test. Does it show?
Peace, kim
PS - Please email me anytime at: ---> joka3@earthlink.net or at ---> kkelly@webspawner.com
kim
|
Verdict:
9.33.
Log in to rate
joekelly (9.33)
|
USA
|
6/9/2003 8:08:18 AM
|
|
|
|
Argument FOR the Existence of a Perfect Creator
|
First, concerning the abnormality of perfection, many would argue that perfection IS abnormal, because so few people and things (if ANYone or ANYthing) attains it. Therefore, what is normal (the majority) is imperfect. This makes perfection abnormal to many.
Non-Christian Perspective: Secondly, disregarding nature, humans are the creators of all other things. Each person creates his or her reality, what is "perfect" for each. So, perfection is in the eye of the beholder--subjective, as it has already been established. Kim summed it up quite well. On a more individual level, however, multiple perfect creators (humans) exist. In fact, all creators are perfect, as they all create something that is perfect for at least one person. The simple feeling of disliking a situation that one has created does not denote imperfection. Perfection, in a broad sense, may be defined as what is in the best interest of the Universe. I disagree that evil (or suffering in any sense) is the essence of imperfection. Without suffering and evil, no one would grow or learn or evolve. Humanity as a whole would be stuck in a stagnant pool of muck--"only-good perfection." Eventually, "goodness" would not even be acknowledged, and humanity would devolve into uniform evil or suffering, and then there would be the acknowledgment of goodness and growth again. Therefore, goodness can exist only along side evil. Nothing exists without it's antithesis. No object can exist without the space to hold it, without the space between the electrons of its atoms. Therefore, good AND evil combine to create perfection, and in a sense, since according to many the Creator created all--good and evil, the Creator is perfect.
|
Verdict:
10.00.
Log in to rate
liquidelectronica (7.65)
|
private
|
6/12/2003 11:42:08 PM
|
|
|
|
Argument FOR the Existence of a Perfect Creator
|
Excellent!
"Everything in perfect rhythm, everything in perfect motion." --Sky Cries Mary
|
Verdict:
7.00.
Log in to rate
torinaga (7.71)
|
Tacoma, WA
|
6/13/2003 9:49:20 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Argument against the Existence of a Perfect Creator
|
Well, if the creator is perfect, he can make what he wants perfectly. Perhaps his creations are simply pefectly imperfect. I don't mean to sound like a pseudo-intellectual, but I think that's what it all boils down to.
Something like that, perhaps.
Nikki
|
Verdict:
1.00.
Log in to rate
imetsanta (4.00)
|
private
|
7/9/2003 5:39:34 PM
|
|
|
|
Argument against the Existence of a Perfect Creator
|
good point! again, it all depends on your definition of perfection...
|
Verdict:
2.00.
Log in to rate
liquidelectronica (7.65)
|
private
|
7/10/2003 3:42:39 PM
|
|
|
|
Argument against the Existence of a Perfect Creator
|
Perfection is something that we as imperfect being have created in order to give ourselves something to strive for in our seemingly meaningless lives.
Coming from a Christian background I believe that we can only reach true perfection once we are saved, die and reach the afterlife.
|
Verdict:
1.00.
Log in to rate
rkane (5.50)
|
USA
|
7/17/2003 1:26:03 PM
|
|
|
|
Argument against the Existence of a Perfect Creator
|
Well, I'm not Christian but I agree with rkane in that perfection cannot be attained in this life. There are too many factors to consider, there's always a way that something you think is perfect can be destroyed. I know the feeling of what some people think is perfection, I also know what it's like to have that taken away and not being able to do anything about it. Things can be good, things can be great, but NOTHING and NO ONE is perfect.
|
Verdict:
1.00.
Log in to rate
AsthmaticDuck (7.98)
|
Seattle,WA
|
7/19/2003 8:06:26 PM
|
|
|
|
Argument against the Existence of a Perfect Creator
|
Kinda reminds me of that movie, Shallow Hal. He had it perfect when his eyes were seeing the inner beauty, but when he lost that blessing/curse he wasn't totally happy anymore.
|
Verdict:
still out.
Log in to rate
rkane (5.50)
|
USA
|
7/21/2003 8:41:17 AM
|
|
|
Argument against the Existence of a Perfect Creator
|
that is where creating "perfection" inside yourself comes into play. If you are being true to yourself and cultivate true inner peace (yes, it is possible) NO ONE can take it away from you. We create our own realities, and since we have only imagined control over what happens around us, we can change our whole world by how we look at things. It's all a choice. If you choose to see the world as perfect, then it is. If not, it's not.
|
Verdict:
6.00.
Log in to rate
liquidelectronica (7.65)
|
private
|
7/23/2003 3:17:27 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Argument against the Existence of a Perfect Creator
|
What is the basis of the statement ,"perfection cannot create imperfection"?
In the analogy of the perfect game (as stated above), the perfect score may create some imperfection, others may become jeolous, seek revenge and kill you for your perfect score.
Unlikely, maybe, but not outside the realm of extreme possibility.
|
Verdict:
still out.
Log in to rate
Milkman (6.67)
|
Nebraska, USA
|
7/22/2003 10:11:31 PM
|
|
|
|
Argument against the Existence of a Perfect Creator
|
who's to say the jealousy, feelings of revenge and murder are not perfect?
|
Verdict:
still out.
Log in to rate
liquidelectronica (7.65)
|
private
|
7/23/2003 3:18:48 PM
|
|
|
|
Argument against the Existence of a Perfect Creator
|
but conversely, who can say that they are [perfect]?
|
Verdict:
still out.
Log in to rate
Milkman (6.67)
|
Nebraska, USA
|
7/23/2003 7:43:21 PM
|
|
|
|
Argument against the Existence of a Perfect Creator
|
nobody can say anything... ultimately, none of us really know the 'TRUTH...' everything I say, or anyone else says is all speculation. Just for fun! :-)
|
Verdict:
still out.
Log in to rate
liquidelectronica (7.65)
|
private
|
7/23/2003 9:52:07 PM
|
|
|
Argument against the Existence of a Perfect Creator
|
I am perfect. There I said it. It is the meaning of it that is slippery.
In a perfect game, so long as the game itself is perfect the after effects do not change the fact that the game was perfect. That would just make life imperfect, which is something that I cannot even begin to argue for or against.
|
Verdict:
still out.
Log in to rate
torinaga (7.71)
|
Tacoma, WA
|
7/25/2003 11:31:47 PM
|
|
|
|
Argument against the Existence of a Perfect Creator
|
Still something perfect (the game) has created something imperfect (the after effects). Why not the same with the Perfect Creater?
|
Verdict:
still out.
Log in to rate
Milkman (6.67)
|
Nebraska, USA
|
7/27/2003 3:36:01 AM
|
|
|
|
Argument against the Existence of a Perfect Creator
|
The game actually did not create anything. Cause and effect are not in the same category with Creator and Creation. As most mass and energy theories go nothing is created yet it is only acted upon by forces that may put it into a different shape, but still at the lowest level it is the same.
|
Verdict:
still out.
Log in to rate
rkane (5.50)
|
USA
|
7/28/2003 3:16:47 PM
|
|
|
|
Argument against the Existence of a Perfect Creator
|
Depends on how far you trust science.
It has been said that there are 3 paths to wisdom: Reflection, which is the noblest, imitation, which is the easiest, and through experience, which is the bitterest.
I have previously thought that there are 3 institutions to reflect this: Philosophy (reflection), Religion (imitation of God, Jesus, Buddhas, etc), and Science (Experience).
If science is based on experience,then every fact is true right up until you screw up. Therefore the mass and energy theories don't carry much weight because all we have to do is find it to be incorrect and suddenly its wrong.
|
Verdict:
still out.
Log in to rate
Milkman (6.67)
|
Nebraska, USA
|
7/29/2003 2:53:03 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Argument against the Existence of a Perfect Creator
|
I disagree with your post for several main reasons.
Before I get into what my objections are, it is worth noting that I believe not only in an omniscient, omnipotent, and omnipresent God, but I also believe in the (admittedly) quite radical claims of Jesus Christ.
Quite obviously this means I have a dog in the fight, and must naturally disagree with you on a fundamental level; for if your theory was correct, than I would be as big a knucklehead as most people percieve Christians to be.
Just as obviously, however, a simple rebuttal or dismissal of your post based on that fact alone would indicate there is no logic in Christianity. So here goes my objections, and I shall try my hardest to avoid annoying Christian-ese "because God says so" arguments...
a.) My first issue with your post concerns circular logic. Circular logic, by it's very definition, is quite subjective and based an awful lot on assumptions. Semantics, ignorance, and prejudice (for either side of the debate) all factor in at a high rate when involving circular logic...What's more, you can see the impasse arrived at by simply imagining someone with an opposing viewpoint using the same tactic.
For instance; if I were to say "the bible is the inherit word of God, so therefore everything in it is correct", I could then go on and prove the existence of God by following up with "and since the bible is the inherit work of God, then when it mentions God it's absolute truth".
Other than convincing absolutely no one, that statement wouldn't accomplish much...
b.) Regardless if you believe in religion as the opiate of the masses or if you believe in God: Exactly how is it possible to understand "perfection" to the extent that such simple lines can be drawn to and fro, as if you are intimately familiar with how it operates?
If there exists a perfect Creator, it would be ridiculous to challenge His perfection, for quite obviously He's on a higher playing field than us. And if there is no such thing as a perfect Creator, then there is no such thing as perfection. Because it would have never been created.
(by the way, the above paragraph is not circular logic. read it again and you'll see the difference).
Okay, I'm way behind on sleep so I'm out...I think it's very cool that you're thinking these "deep thoughts". hopefully you will stay true to that personal integrity and find answers that intrinsically you knew all along. Many self proclaimed "christians" never have the balls to ask the tough questions.
God bless,
40
|
Verdict:
still out.
Log in to rate
fourtymules_oneounce (unrated)
|
USA
|
7/31/2003 7:40:12 PM
|
|
|
|
Argument against the Existence of a Perfect Creator
|
There's no arguing with that logic.
|
Verdict:
still out.
Log in to rate
Milkman (6.67)
|
Nebraska, USA
|
8/2/2003 12:12:39 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Argument against the Existence of a Perfect Creator
|
God is the Creator of the Universe. I think that conceptualising Him in human terms is always a risky business.
|
Verdict:
still out.
Log in to rate
Ptasneem (unrated)
|
private
|
8/10/2003 11:47:42 AM
|
|
|
Argument against the Existence of a Perfect Creator
|
I like how Douglas Adams put it:
Now it is such a bizarrely impossible coincidence that anything so mind-bogglingly useful could have evolved purely by chance that some thinkers have chosen to see it as a final and clinching proof of the nonexistence of God. The arguement goes something like this: "I refuse to prove that I exist," says God, "for proof denies faith, and without faith I am nothing." "But," say Man, "the Babel fish is a dead giveaway, isn't it? It could not have evolved by chance. It proves you exist, and so therefore, by your own arguments, you don't. QED." "Oh dear," says God, "I hadn't though of that" and promply vanishes in a puff of logic.
|
Verdict:
still out.
Log in to rate
veriria (unrated)
|
schererville, IN
|
2/8/2006 5:53:18 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What's this all about?
GAZM.org is founded on the principle that expression assures one's sense of self, advances knowledge and determines truth. GAZM users encourage each other's expression by engaging the heart, exciting the mind and stimulating the soul with constant streams of provocative thoughts, opinions, ideas and art. Do not be intimidated to join (for free), post often and seduce others to do the same.
Random Uploads: (rating)
|
(5.67)
|
|
(8.00)
|
|
(6.00)
|
|
(7.00)
|
|
(9.70)
|
Top Uploads: (size, rating)
|
*love.jpg
(281.66kb,
9.70)
|
|
*fetishes.gif
(196.21kb,
9.70)
|
|
*southstreet.jpg
(161.65kb,
9.50)
|
|
*channelingsound2.jpg
(80.87kb,
9.50)
|
|
*crazy[1].wav
(37.85kb,
9.25)
|
|
*nocturnal.jpg
(88.61kb,
9.00)
|
|
*intro.doc
(41.00kb,
9.00)
|
|
*krstark.jpg
(15.58kb,
9.00)
|
|
*bluehunger.jpg
(99.77kb,
8.83)
|
|
*ek_1.jpg
(273.01kb,
8.83)
|
Siteseeing: (suggest)
Fazed
BBspot
Karber
Monoki
Banneshee
Stick Suicide
Big Blue Blog
Project Monkey
Jacob Shwirtz - The Journal
|
|
|
|
|